Complications of Ultrasound-Guided vs Conventional Radial or Femoral Puncture in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory and Electrophysiology Laboratory of a Tertiary Care Hospital Performed by Residents
Original Article
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: Ultrasound (US) is increasingly used in interventional cardiology and electrophysiology when arterial or venous puncture is required for diagnostic and/or therapeutic purposes. Clinicians must look for ways to reduce procedural risks while maximizing success. Therefore, US offers significant advantages as guidance during vascular access.
Objective: To describe the prevalence of complications from vascular punctures (venous and/or arterial) performed with and without US. Secondarily, to compare the complications between both groups.
Methods: This was a retrospective and analytic study to determine if the intervention with US guidance reduced complication rates. We evaluated patients who underwent US-guided puncture for diagnostic or therapeutic purposes in June 2024.
Results: A total of 54 patients were included, 27 in the US-guided group and 27 in the conventional group. Demographic characteristics, comorbidities, pharmacological treatment, laboratory findings and indications for puncture were similar between both groups. The number of attempts was similar (p= 0.776), as well as to achieve a successful puncture (p= 0.639). In the US-guided group, ecchymosis was observed in 6 cases (22.2%) vs 7 cases (25.9%) in the conventional group (p= 0.750). For some outcomes (hematomas appearance and hematoma severity) the results favored the use of US-guided punctures to reduce complications. Hematomas occurred in 2 cases (7.4%) in the US group vs 7 cases (25.9%) in the conventional group (p= 0.068). Hematoma severity, measured using the EASY scale, showed a trend favoring US guidance (p= 0.087).
Conclusions: In our study, the use of US-guided interventional and electrophysiological procedures was associated with a trend to reduce hematoma occurrence and its severity with comparable success and attempt rates.
Downloads
Article Details
Copyright (c) 2025 Domínguez DR, et al.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Covello B, McKeon B. Fluoroscopic angiography assessment, protocols, and interpretation. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33760526/ PubMed+1
Sandoval Y, Burke MN, Lobo AS, Lips DL, Seto AH, Chavez I. Contemporary arterial access in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10(22):2233‑41. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2017.08.058
Stone P, Campbell J, Thompson S, Walker J. A prospective, randomized study comparing ultrasound versus fluoroscopy‑guided femoral arterial access in noncardiac vascular patients. J Vasc Surg. 2020;72(1):259‑67. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2019.09.051
Genre Grandpierre R, Bobbia X, Muller L, Markarian T, Occéan B‑V, Pommet S. Ultrasound guidance in difficult radial artery puncture for blood gas analysis: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2019;14(3):e0213683. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213683
Cho S‑A, Jang Y‑E, Ji S‑H, Kim E‑H, Lee J‑H, Kim H‑S. Ultrasound‑guided arterial catheterization. Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2021;16(2):119‑32. Available from: https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.21012
Sanmartín M, Cuevas D, Goicolea J, Ruiz‑Salmerón R, Gómez M, Argibay V. Vascular complications associated with radial artery access for cardiac catheterization. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2004;57(6):581‑4. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15225506/
Riangwiwat T, Blankenship JC. Vascular complications of transradial access for cardiac catheterization. US Cardiol Rev. 2021;15:e04. Available from: https://doi.org/10.15420/usc.2020.23
Molero‑Díez YB, Sánchez‑Tabernero A, Méndez‑Torrubiano I, Vaca‑Fernández PL. Advantages of using ultrasound in perioperative arterial cannulation. Nuevo Hosp. 2022;XVIII(2):6‑11. Available from: https://www.saludcastillayleon.es/CAZamora/es/publicaciones/revista-nuevo-hospital-2022/nuevo-hospital-2022-junio-xviii-2/molero-diez-yb-sanchez-tabernero-mendez-torrubiano-i-vaca-f
Almeida CES de. Vascular access: the impact of ultrasonography. Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2016;14(4):561‑6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1590/s1679-45082016rw3129
Seto AH, Roberts JS, Abu‑Fadel MS, Czak SJ, Latif F, Jain SP, et al. Real‑time ultrasound guidance facilitates transradial access: RAUST (Radial Artery access with Ultrasound Trial). JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8(2):283‑91. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2014.05.036
D’Entremont M‑A, Alrashidi S, Seto AH, Nguyen P, Marquis‑Gravel G, Abu‑Fadel MS, et al. Ultrasound guidance for transfemoral access in coronary procedures: an individual participant‑level data meta‑analysis from the femoral ultrasound trialist collaboration. EuroIntervention. 2024;20(1):66‑74. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4244/eij-d-22-00809
Balaji NR, Shah PB. Radial artery catheterization. Circulation. 2011;124(16):e407‑8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.111.019802 AHA Journals
Hadjivassiliou A, Kiemeneij F, Nathan S, Klass D. Ultrasound‑guided access to the distal radial artery at the anatomical snuffbox for catheter‑based vascular interventions: a technical guide. EuroIntervention. 2021;16(16):1342‑8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4244/eij-d-19-00555
Tamayo N, Vallejo Franco J, Senior Sánchez JM, Fernández Cadavid A, Rodríguez Dimuro A, Toro JM. Eficacia y seguridad del acceso radial y femoral en pacientes con síndrome coronario agudo llevados a intervencionismo coronario: Redial. Acta Med Colomb. 2015;40(3):209‑17.
Mason PJ, Shah B, Tamis‑Holland JE, Bittl JA, Cohen MG, Safirstein J, et al. An update on radial artery access and best practices for transradial coronary angiography and intervention in acute coronary syndrome: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11(9):e000035. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1161/hcv.0000000000000035
Xenogiannis I, Varlamos C, Keeble TR, Kalogeropoulos AS, Karamasis GV. Ultrasound‑guided femoral vascular access for percutaneous coronary and structural interventions. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023;13(12):2028. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13122028
Freixa X, Romaguera R, Botas J, Trillo R, Martín‑Moreiras J, Jurado‑Román A. Abordaje de los accesos vasculares en intervencionismo en cardiopatía estructural. REC Interv Cardiol. 2022;4:311‑8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.24875/RECIC.M22000327
Li J, Cao Z, Zhang T, Zhao K, Zhao J, Yang Y, et al. Meta‑analysis of ultrasound‑guided and traditional femoral artery puncture. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023;10:1161834. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1161834
Flumignan RLG, Trevisani VFM, Lopes RD, Baptista‑Silva JCC, Flumignan CDQ, Nakano LCU. Ultrasound guidance for arterial (other than femoral) catheterisation in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;(10):CD013585. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd013585.pub2
Gladden JD, Gulati R, Sandoval Y. Contemporary techniques for femoral and radial arterial access in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022;23(9):316. Available from: https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2309316
Wu X‑L, Wang J‑J, Yuan D‑Q, Chen W‑T. Ultrasound‑guided radial artery catheterization at different sites: a prospective and randomized study. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2022;26(2):415‑21. Available from: https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_202201_27865
Peters C, Schwarz SKW, Yarnold CH, Kojic K, Kojic S, Head SJ. Ultrasound guidance versus direct palpation for radial artery catheterization by expert operators: a randomized trial among Canadian cardiac anesthesiologists. Can J Anaesth. 2015;62(11):1161‑8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630‑015‑0426‑8